Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Nissan Note 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Nissan Note is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Liana engine produces 4 HP less power than Nissan Note, whereas torque is 9 NM less than Nissan Note. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Liana reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Note is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Liana consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Liana consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. Nissan Note 2005 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.55 m | |
| Suzuki Liana is 15 cm longer than the Nissan Note, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1332 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 1 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`560 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Nissan Note has
| |