Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Volvo C30 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo C30 is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Liana engine produces 19 HP less power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Volvo C30. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Liana reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Liana is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Liana consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that by driving the Suzuki Liana over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Liana consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo V50, Volvo S40 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Liana might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Suzuki Liana is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Liana is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 251 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo C30, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |