Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
| Suzuki Liana engine produces 22 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.9 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Liana consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.55 m | |
| Suzuki Liana is 42 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 155 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |