Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Mazda 3 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Suzuki Liana engine produces 19 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Mazda 3. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.4 | |
|
The Mazda 3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Liana consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Suzuki Liana is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Liana is 35 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |