Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Suzuki Liana 2004

 
Suzuki Liana
2004 - 2007
Suzuki Liana
2004 - 2007
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 107 HP107 HP
Torque: 144 NM144 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Suzuki Liana 2004 and Suzuki Liana 2004 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.08.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km8.8 l/100km
The Suzuki Liana 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Suzuki Liana 2004 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Liana 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana 2004 could require 120 litres more fuel.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Engine production duration: 23 years23 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.23 m4.35 m
Width: 1.69 m1.69 m
Height: 1.55 m1.45 m
Suzuki Liana 2004 is 12 cm shorter than the Suzuki Liana 2004, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Liana 2004 is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: no data10 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`600
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 12001400
Pros and Cons:
    Suzuki Liana has
    • lower fuel consumption
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv