Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Suzuki Liana 2004
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 107 HP | 107 HP | |
Torque: | 144 NM | 144 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Suzuki Liana 2004 and Suzuki Liana 2004 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 8.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
The Suzuki Liana 2004 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Liana 2004 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Liana 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana 2004 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 24 years | 24 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.23 m | 4.35 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.45 m | |
Suzuki Liana 2004 is 12 cm shorter than the Suzuki Liana 2004, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Liana 2004 is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Liana has
| |