Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2007
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14 seconds | |
| Suzuki Liana engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi Lancer, but torque is 1 NM more than Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.0 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Lancer is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Liana consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Colt, Smart ForFour, Mitsubishi Xpander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Liana might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Suzuki Liana 2004 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Suzuki Liana is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Liana is 34 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`600 kg | 1`750 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |