Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 107 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Suzuki Liana engine produces 2 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 6.3 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Liana consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Smart ForFour, Mitsubishi Xpander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Liana might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 3.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.55 m | |
| Suzuki Liana is 36 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`465 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |