Suzuki Liana 2001 vs Hyundai Matrix 2001
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 141 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Liana is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Liana and Hyundai Matrix have the same engine power, but Suzuki Liana torque is 3 NM more than Hyundai Matrix. Suzuki Liana reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Liana is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Liana consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Matrix, which means that by driving the Suzuki Liana over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Liana consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Matrix. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Matrix engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki Liana 2001 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.64 m | |
| Suzuki Liana is 21 cm longer than the Hyundai Matrix, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1062 litres | 1284 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Matrix, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`670 kg | 1`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`275 kg | 1`323 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 395 kg | 477 kg | |
| Suzuki Liana load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem less than Hyundai Matrix. Therefore, Hyundai Matrix is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Hyundai Matrix has
| |