Suzuki Liana 2001 vs Hyundai Accent 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Suzuki Liana engine produces 13 HP more power than Hyundai Accent, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Hyundai Accent. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Liana reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Accent is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Liana consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Accent, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Liana could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Liana consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Accent. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 24 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Grand Vitara, Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Vitara | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Liana might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai Accent engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Suzuki Liana 2001 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Suzuki Liana is larger. Suzuki Liana is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai Accent, 2 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 321 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1062 litres | 859 litres | |
|
Suzuki Liana has more luggage capacity. Suzuki Liana has 27 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Accent. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Liana (by 203 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.1 metres more than that of the Hyundai Accent. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`670 | 1`490 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Hyundai Accent has
| |