Suzuki Liana 2001 vs Kia Optima 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Suzuki Liana is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Optima can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 | 1.8 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 103 HP | 134 - 181 HP | |
| Torque: | 116 - 144 NM | 169 - 245 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 13.3 seconds | 8.5 - 10.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 7.7 | 9.1 - 10.4 | |
|
Suzuki Liana petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Optima. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Suzuki Liana is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Liana is 38 cm shorter than the Kia Optima, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 479 litres | |
| Suzuki Liana has 1 litres more trunk space than the Kia Optima. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.4 metres less than that of the Kia Optima, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`903 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
| |