Suzuki Liana 2001 vs Dodge Neon 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Suzuki Liana is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Dodge Neon can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 103 HP | 116 - 215 HP | |
Torque: | 116 - 144 NM | 157 - 332 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 13.3 seconds | 5.9 - 11 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 7.7 | 7.0 - 10.8 | |
Suzuki Liana petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dodge Neon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.35 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.42 m | |
Suzuki Liana is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Liana is 8 cm shorter than the Dodge Neon, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 371 litres | |
Suzuki Liana has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Liana has 109 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Neon. The Dodge Neon may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`653 | ~ 1`573 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
| |