Suzuki Liana 2001 vs Kia Shuma 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Suzuki Liana is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Shuma can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.3 - 1.6 | 1.6 - 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 106 HP | 101 - 114 HP | |
Torque: | 116 - 144 NM | 148 - 152 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 13.3 seconds | 10.6 - 13.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 8.2 | 8.0 - 9.8 | |
Suzuki Liana petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Shuma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.24 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.42 m | |
Suzuki Liana is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Liana is 28 cm shorter than the Kia Shuma, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1149 litres | 1207 litres | |
Kia Shuma has more luggage space. Suzuki Liana has 92 litres less trunk space than the Kia Shuma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Shuma (by 58 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`650 | ~ 1`635 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Kia Shuma has
| |