Suzuki Liana 2001 vs Kia Shuma 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Suzuki Liana
2001 - 2004
Kia Shuma
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Suzuki Liana is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Kia Shuma can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.3 - 1.61.6 - 1.8

Performance

Power: 90 - 106 HP101 - 114 HP
Torque: 116 - 144 NM148 - 152 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 - 13.3 seconds10.6 - 13.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7 - 8.28.0 - 9.8
Suzuki Liana petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Kia Shuma.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.24 m4.52 m
Width: 1.69 m1.72 m
Height: 1.55 m1.42 m
Suzuki Liana is smaller, but higher.
Suzuki Liana is 28 cm shorter than the Kia Shuma, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 13 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 348 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1149 litres1207 litres
Kia Shuma has more luggage space.
Suzuki Liana has 92 litres less trunk space than the Kia Shuma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Kia Shuma (by 58 litres).
Turning diameter: 10 meters9.8 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.2 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`650~ 1`635
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 800no data
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Liana has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • lower fuel consumption
Kia Shuma has
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv