Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Volkswagen Golf 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 107 HP | 80 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 200 NM | 132 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 12.9 seconds | 6.9 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 9.0 | 4.9 - 7.4 | |
|
Suzuki Liana petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Golf. On average, Suzuki Liana equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.48 m | |
| Suzuki Liana is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Liana is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1305 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 1 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`864 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |