Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Suzuki Swift 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.2 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 107 HP | 70 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 200 NM | 116 - 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 12.9 seconds | 10 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 9.0 | 4.6 - 6.5 | |
|
Suzuki Liana petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. On average, Suzuki Liana equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.51 m | |
| Suzuki Liana is 53 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Liana is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 562 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.6 metres more than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Suzuki Liana can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |