Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Suzuki Liana
2004 - 2007
Mitsubishi Colt
2004 - 2008
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Suzuki Liana is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Colt can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.4 - 1.61.1 - 1.5

Performance

Power: 90 - 107 HP68 - 150 HP
Torque: 144 - 200 NM100 - 210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 - 12.9 seconds8 - 14.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 9.04.4 - 6.8
Suzuki Liana petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, Suzuki Liana equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.23 m3.86 m
Width: 1.69 m1.70 m
Height: 1.55 m1.55 m
Suzuki Liana is 37 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no data500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data760 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`600~ 1`497
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 16001600
Pros and Cons: Suzuki Liana has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Mitsubishi Colt has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv