Suzuki Liana 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Suzuki Liana is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mitsubishi Colt can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 107 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 144 - 200 NM | 100 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 - 12.9 seconds | 8 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 9.0 | 4.4 - 6.8 | |
|
Suzuki Liana petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Colt. On average, Suzuki Liana equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 3.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.55 m | |
| Suzuki Liana is 37 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 760 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Liana is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Suzuki Liana can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`497 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Liana has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |