Suzuki Jimny 2004 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.6 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Jimny engine produces 95 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 213 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Jimny reaches 100 km/h speed 7.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Jimny is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Jimny consumes 4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Suzuki Jimny over 15,000 km in a year you can save 600 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Jimny consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Suzuki Jimny is smaller. Suzuki Jimny is 70 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 30 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Jimny is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 113 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
324 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Jimny is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Suzuki Jimny can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Jimny has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Jimny has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |