Suzuki Jimny 2004 vs Jeep Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 20.6 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Jimny engine produces 85 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 200 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Jimny reaches 100 km/h speed 8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Jimny is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Jimny consumes 3.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Suzuki Jimny over 15,000 km in a year you can save 570 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Jimny consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Nissan Almera, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Suzuki Jimny is smaller. Suzuki Jimny is 82 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 22 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Jimny is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 113 litres | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
324 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Suzuki Jimny has 707 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Cherokee (by 1626 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Jimny is 1.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Suzuki Jimny can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`500 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Jimny has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |