Suzuki Jimny 2005 vs Nissan Qashqai 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Jimny engine produces 17 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Jimny reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 5.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 5.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Jimny consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Jimny could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Jimny consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 1100 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Suzuki Jimny is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Jimny is 69 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 18 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Jimny is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 113 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
324 litres | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Suzuki Jimny has 297 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 1189 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Jimny is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Suzuki Jimny can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Suzuki Jimny has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Suzuki Jimny, so Suzuki Jimny quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Jimny has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |