Suzuki Jimny 2005 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Jimny engine produces 104 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 220 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Jimny reaches 100 km/h speed 8.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Jimny is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Jimny consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Suzuki Jimny over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Jimny consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Suzuki Jimny is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Jimny is 72 cm shorter than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 30 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Jimny is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 113 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
324 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Suzuki Jimny has 437 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Jimny is 1.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Suzuki Jimny can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`300 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Jimny has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |