Suzuki Jimny 2005 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Jimny engine produces 105 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Jimny reaches 100 km/h speed 5.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Jimny is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Jimny consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that by driving the Suzuki Jimny over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Jimny consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 450 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Jimny might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Suzuki Jimny is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Jimny is 50 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Jimny is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 113 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
324 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage space. Suzuki Jimny has 138 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Jimny is 0.9 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Suzuki Jimny can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Suzuki Jimny has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Juke has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Suzuki Jimny, so Suzuki Jimny quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Jimny has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |