Suzuki Jimny 2005 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Jimny engine produces 15 HP less power than Toyota Urban Cruiser, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Toyota Urban Cruiser. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Jimny reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Jimny consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Jimny could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Jimny consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Urban Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Urban Cruiser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 3.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Suzuki Jimny is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Jimny is 29 cm shorter than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Jimny is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 113 litres | 314 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
324 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has more luggage space. Suzuki Jimny has 201 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Jimny has
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
| |