Suzuki Jimny 2005 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Jimny engine produces 32 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Jimny reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Jimny consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Jimny could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Jimny consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Ignis | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Jimny might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.64 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Suzuki Jimny is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Jimny is 66 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Jimny is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 113 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
324 litres | 1219 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX has more luggage space. Suzuki Jimny has 306 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi ASX (by 895 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Jimny is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Suzuki Jimny can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Jimny has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5800 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Jimny has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |