Suzuki Jimny 2018 vs Nissan Juke 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Suzuki Jimny engine produces 15 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Nissan Juke. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 46 litres | |
| 510 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Jimny engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Micra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Juke might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan Juke engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.65 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Suzuki Jimny is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Jimny is 49 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Jimny is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 85 litres | 354 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 422 litres | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage space. Suzuki Jimny has 269 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Jimny is 0.9 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Suzuki Jimny can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`435 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Juke scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Juke scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Jimny has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Jimny has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |