Suzuki Jimny 2023 vs Chevrolet Tahoe 2024
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suzuki Jimny is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Chevrolet Tahoe is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Suzuki Jimny is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Tahoe can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chevrolet Tahoe also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 3.0 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Chevrolet Tahoe is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 - 105 HP | 305 - 420 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 - 134 NM | 519 - 671 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| In general, Chevrolet Tahoe are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Suzuki Jimny. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 - 7.7 | 13.8 - 14.7 | |
|
Suzuki Jimny petrol engines consumes on average 7.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Tahoe. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.99 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 211 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
332 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`545 kg | ~ 3`368 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`185 kg | ~ 2`596 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 360 kg | ~ 772 kg | |
| Suzuki Jimny load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is more than two times less than Chevrolet Tahoe. Therefore, Chevrolet Tahoe is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Jimny has
|
Chevrolet Tahoe has
| |