Suzuki Ignis 2003 vs Renault Clio 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 105 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Ignis is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Ignis engine produces 34 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Suzuki Ignis reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Clio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Ignis consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Ignis could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Ignis consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Clio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo, Renault Twingo, Dacia Sandero | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.62 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.65 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.42 m | |
| Suzuki Ignis is 19 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 1 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Ignis is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 280 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1037 litres | |
|
Suzuki Ignis has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Ignis has 25 litres more trunk space than the Renault Clio. The Renault Clio may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Ignis is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Suzuki Ignis has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Suzuki Ignis, so Suzuki Ignis quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Ignis has
|
Renault Clio has
| |