Suzuki Ignis 2003 vs Audi A2 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.2 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 69 HP | 61 HP | |
Torque: | 170 NM | 140 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 14.8 seconds | |
Suzuki Ignis engine produces 8 HP more power than Audi A2, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Audi A2. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Ignis reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 2.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 3.2 l/100km | |
The Audi A2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Ignis consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Ignis could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Ignis consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 39 litres | 34 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
780 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
Audi A2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Ignis engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 16 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Suzuki Wagon R+ | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Lupo, Seat Arosa | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A2 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.77 m | 3.83 m | |
Width: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.55 m | |
Suzuki Ignis is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Ignis is 6 cm shorter than the Audi A2, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Ignis is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 236 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1002 litres | 1085 litres | |
Audi A2 has more luggage space. Suzuki Ignis has 114 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A2 (by 83 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Suzuki Ignis is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A2. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`245 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Suzuki Ignis has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi A2, so Suzuki Ignis quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Ignis has
|
Audi A2 has
| |