Suzuki Ignis 2003 vs Audi A2 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 126 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Ignis is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Ignis engine produces 19 HP more power than Audi A2, but torque is 8 NM less than Audi A2. Thanks to more power Suzuki Ignis reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Ignis consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Ignis could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Ignis consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 19 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Wagon R+, Suzuki Jimny | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Polo, Skoda Octavia, Skoda Fabia | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Audi A2 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine: Engine is known for its simplicity, compact design, and overall reliability. Many complaints from owners are related to power loss or fluctuating idle, often caused by issues with the throttle body, EGR valve, or air leaks ... More about Audi A2 2000 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.77 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Suzuki Ignis is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Ignis is 6 cm shorter than the Audi A2, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Ignis is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 236 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1002 litres | 1085 litres | |
|
Audi A2 has more luggage space. Suzuki Ignis has 154 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A2 (by 83 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Ignis is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A2. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`470 | 1`435 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Suzuki Ignis has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Audi A2, so Suzuki Ignis quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Ignis has
|
Audi A2 has
| |