Suzuki Ignis 2016 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 HP | 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
| Suzuki Ignis engine produces 3 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, but torque is 2 NM more than Suzuki Swift. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.9 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Ignis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Ignis consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Suzuki Ignis over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Ignis consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 32 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Suzuki Ignis is smaller, but higher. Suzuki Ignis is 15 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Ignis is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 267 litres | 204 litres | |
|
Suzuki Ignis has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Suzuki Ignis has 63 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The Suzuki Swift may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki Swift scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Ignis has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |