Suzuki Grand Vitara 2003 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 3 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 10 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 50 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 258 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
828 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Land Rover Freelander, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
| |