Suzuki Grand Vitara 2003 vs Land Rover Freelander 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 97 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.6 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 12 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 46 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 258 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
828 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2.2 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Land Rover Freelander has serious deffects in 330 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |