Suzuki Grand Vitara 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Suzuki Grand Vitara) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda CR-V) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 41 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 80 NM more than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 760 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 66 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 258 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
828 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 267 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 124 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`600 kg | 1`910 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`200 kg | 1`485 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 400 kg | 425 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |