Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999 vs Honda CR-V 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 22 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Honda CR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 28 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 66 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
828 litres | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`600 kg | 1`910 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |