Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 13 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 225 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine with a large resource. Can have inherent vibrations and is noisier than a typical petrol engine. Spare parts widely available. May have problems with ignition system and temperature ... More about Hyundai Tucson 2004 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 40 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
828 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Hyundai Tucson has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Hyundai Tucson, so Hyundai Tucson quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |