Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999 vs Honda HR-V 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 23 HP more power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Honda HR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 8.4 | |
|
The Honda HR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Honda HR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.58 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 19 cm shorter than the Honda HR-V, 8 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 285 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
828 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1.4 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`580 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |