Suzuki Grand Vitara 1999 vs Ford Maverick 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 128 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 22 HP less power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 26 NM less than Ford Maverick. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 11.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 52 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 985 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
828 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |