Suzuki Grand Vitara 2000 vs Honda CR-V 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 94 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 56 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.7 l/100km | 9.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda CR-V 2002 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.92 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 66 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 210 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
828 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 315 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 124 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`600 kg | 1`910 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`235 kg | 1`485 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 365 kg | 425 kg | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Honda CR-V. Therefore, Honda CR-V is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |