Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 7 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.4 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 51 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 5 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
758 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 226 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 1083 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`070 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |