Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 44 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Grand Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 64 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
758 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 343 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 194 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |