Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 34 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 47 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 550 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena, Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Grand Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 51 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 5 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
758 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 226 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 1083 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |