Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Tucson is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 35 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.00 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 32 cm shorter than the Hyundai Tucson, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
758 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 460 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.6 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Hyundai Tucson has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |