Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 132 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is more dynamic to drive. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 66 HP more power than Toyota Urban Cruiser, whereas torque is 93 NM more than Toyota Urban Cruiser. Thanks to more power Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 585 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 630 km on highway | ||
| 490 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota Verso, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Urban Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Urban Cruiser engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 3.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is larger. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 13 cm longer than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, 9 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 314 litres | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Suzuki Grand Vitara has 130 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. This could mean that the Suzuki Grand Vitara uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 1`590 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
| |