Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 225 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 3 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 490 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.68 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 57 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1742 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 295 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |