Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Suzuki Vitara 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Vitara is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 9 HP more power than Suzuki Vitara, but torque is 20 NM less than Suzuki Vitara. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Scenic | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Grand Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Suzuki Vitara engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 12 cm shorter than the Suzuki Vitara, 4 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 710 litres | |
|
Suzuki Vitara has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 191 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |