Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Skoda Yeti 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Yeti is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 11 HP less power than Skoda Yeti, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Skoda Yeti. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| 670 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 16 cm shorter than the Skoda Yeti, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Skoda Yeti has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Skoda Yeti, so Skoda Yeti quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Skoda Yeti has
| |