Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Nissan Qashqai 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 106 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 23 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 1120 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Scenic | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.62 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 26 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 3 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1513 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 226 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |