Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008 vs Jeep Compass 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 11 HP less power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Jeep Compass. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.5 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Scenic | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Grand Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Compass engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.06 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.63 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 34 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, width is practically the same , while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 334 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1277 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 150 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |