Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Nissan Juke 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan Juke is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 84 HP less power than Nissan Juke, whereas torque is 95 NM less than Nissan Juke. Due to the lower power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.6 | |
|
The Nissan Juke is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Juke, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki SX4, Suzuki Liana, Suzuki Vitara | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Grand Vitara might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.57 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 27 cm shorter than the Nissan Juke, 5 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
516 litres | no data | |
|
Nissan Juke has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 67 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Juke. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 0.7 metres less than that of the Nissan Juke, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan Juke has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Suzuki Grand Vitara has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Juke, so Nissan Juke quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Nissan Juke has
| |