Suzuki Grand Vitara 2012 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 106 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.4 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser is a more dynamic driving. Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 16 HP more power than Toyota Urban Cruiser, but torque is 60 NM less than Toyota Urban Cruiser. Despite the higher power, Suzuki Grand Vitara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 4.6 | |
|
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Suzuki Grand Vitara could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Urban Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.87 m | 3.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.53 m | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara is 7 cm shorter than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, 9 cm wider, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 184 litres | 314 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
516 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has more luggage space. Suzuki Grand Vitara has 130 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Urban Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`625 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
| |