Suzuki Grand Vitara 2003 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 51 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 103 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 11.2 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |