Suzuki Grand Vitara 2003 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara engine produces 3 HP less power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 10 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that by driving the Suzuki Grand Vitara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Suzuki Grand Vitara consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara is smaller, but slightly higher. Suzuki Grand Vitara is 25 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Suzuki Grand Vitara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Suzuki Grand Vitara is 1 metres less than that of the Land Rover Freelander, which means Suzuki Grand Vitara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Land Rover Freelander, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.5/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
|
| |